Microsoft's Megaflop
Software "Bob" tries to be cute,
succeeds at being silly
By Michael Putzel
©1995, The Boston Globe
I've been getting to know a new guy on the block named Bob.
Bob, as you may have heard during the public relations blitz of
the last three months, is Microsoft's new personal computer program
for the home which goes on sale today (March 31, 1995) at computer
and software stores everywhere for about $99.
It has been a fundamental tenet of this column that personal computing
is for everyone and ought to be easier and more reliable for all
of us. I therefore welcome Microsoft's introduction of a program
that sets out to make everyday tasks manageable, cutting through
the technical jargon and confusing routines that frighten many
people away from machines that might make their lives easier.
Unfortunately, Bob is an utter simpleton, poorly designed and
dreadfully executed.
If it were being introduced by anyone but the largest software
maker in the world with the clout to command attention in any
marketplace, you would never hear of this program, and I wouldn't
bother to review it. Bob would simply sink into the bog where
bad products die quiet, unnoticed deaths.
That is particularly sad because the concept of Bob is not only
sound but very much needed. Bob purports to offer families a tool
to help them do more easily and efficiently things they already
do on paper, such as write letters, pay bills, balance their checkbooks
and keep track of addresses, appointments and important dates
like birthdays.
By using familiar formats, such as on-screen check registers and
checks that look as if they were just plucked from someone's pocket
or purse, Bob helps an inexperienced user adapt to what might
otherwise seem an unfriendly electronic environment.
Of course, many computer programs are getting easier to use. Bob
seeks to go further by making a person's initial encounter with
the machine a pleasant experience, presenting the work area as
a ``home'' instead of a collection of indecipherable icons that
newcomers to Microsoft Windows often find forbidding. Pointing
to various symbols scattered around a room and clicking the mouse
enables the user to rearrange the picture on the screen or call
up the functional parts of the program.
Some people may find it terribly cute.
A cartoonish dog of uncertain parentage _ or any one of several
similarly silly ``guides'' _ welcome the user with audible barks,
squawks or painfully clever comments that are supposed to make
you feel comfortable and friendly toward the machine. Microsoft
describes the environment it is seeking to create as a ``social
interface,'' an essentially meaningless bit of new jargon that
deserves to die with Bob.
Most of the effort that went into developing Bob clearly was concentrated
on that interface, rather than in making the functional programs
useful. The software hasn't even been properly debugged.
My first effort at printing a letter, a simple document with the
word ``fax'' in large type on the first line and a paragraph of
normal text below it, produced a pageful of garble, although it
looked fine on the screen and all the settings I could check were
normal.
Other sections of the program, such as the Household Manager and
Financial Guide, consist largely of text dumped from books onto
the hard disk, where they are more difficult to read and haven't
even had the benefit of a good proofreader. Where text didn't
fit in the Bob format, it simply got dropped altogether, even
in mid-phrase.
I asked my teenager to give Bob a go, and he spent an hour decorating
his electronic ``room'' without ever doing a lick of work. That's
okay for starters, but it becomes boring after a while, and Bob
makes getting any job done using a computer more cumbersome than
necessary.
As one example of the program's inefficiency, try changing your
personal password from inside the program (Each user has a password
to enable several members of the same family to keep their work
separate and protect it from the prying eyes of others in the
household.)
First, click on ``Other options,'' then ``Change something,''
then ``Change your password and information,'' then ``Change your
password.'' At that point, the dog reports, ``I can't do that
here,'' and instructs you to leave the program, go back to the
front door of the home and try from there. It takes 17 steps.
My notebook is full of examples of Bob's failure to find the easy
or best way to accomplish simple tasks or to think through the
project at hand.
For some reason, Bob wants to know your time zone when you're
getting started and checks Pacific as if everyone lived with Bob
in Redmond, Wash. One would think that somewhere in the 33 million
bytes of program code Bob takes up on a hard disk, there would
be a little routine that could guess the time zone from the ZIP
code information Bob gathered earlier.
Loading the various elements of the program is agonizingly slow,
and jumping from one part of Bob to another is impossible without
quitting one project and cranking up another. Having a one-track
mind doesn't make jobs easier, but they certainly do take longer.
Bob boasts that the program doesn't come with a manual or traditional
help file because the electronic assistant is always there to
act as a guide. When I wanted to copy a letter I had written,
however, clicking on Rover for help made him scratch himself and
roll over. Cute, perhaps, but hardly the kind of assistance I
needed.
Letter Writer, Bob's basic word processor, is of limited value
to students in the house because it can't do footnotes, and just
to show it's dumber than DOS, it doesn't do envelopes, either.
Perhaps the program's developers don't expect anyone in the house
to do any serious school work _ or mail anything, for that matter.
There is an electronic mail service available to Bob users whose
computers are equipped with modems and connected to telephone
lines. It costs $5 a month for up to 15 brief messages and 45
cents for page-length messages after that. If you're wondering
whether that's reasonabe, America Online offers unlimited e-mail
and up to five hours of news, reference, discussion groups and
on-line chatter for $10 a month. And it's easy, too.
Most offensive of all is Bob's failure to let users grow as their
knowledge and needs increase. If we've learned anything about
personal computing, it is that people who buy machines for one
purpose almost inevitably find they want to do more with them
as they become more adept.
Documents written in Bob, however, can't be read by more advanced
word processing programs, not even those produced by Microsoft,
such as Works or Word. There is simply no room for that sort of
narrow mindedness in today's computer world, where the free exchange
of data is becoming an imperative.
Bob, I'm sad to say, is more a prison than a home.
-- The Boston Globe, March 31, 1995

|